If your employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC might dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had a possibility to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC may allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is generally only performed Should the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Within the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence and also the petitioner company responded to your allegations as a result they were properly mindful of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use for being appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Modest fees utilize.

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252216 Tag:The law enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair on the offender as well as the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other courts However they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.

Also, it could review an appeal of a decision for which it's granted certification. In addition to its legal authority, the Court holds limited political authority. It will review and finalize a decision by The brand new Jersey Redistricting Commission on redistricting congressional districts When the Commission cannot achieve a decision.

2299 of 2025. The findings are pending finalization and will be submitted without delay. In addition they stated that directives for strict compliance have been issued to all Karachi models, with non-compliance dealing with departmental action. Furthermore, they submitted that an existing enquiry is underway. Therefore, These are directed to complete the proceedings and submit the enquiry report to this court through MIT-II of this Court. twelve. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Read more

Many of the volumes (like more recent volumes than the library's holdings) also are available online through the Caselaw Access Project.

Summaries offer a concise insight into the realm of dispute resolution outdoors traditional court proceedings. In Pakistan, arbitration serves as a significant alternative for resolving commercial conflicts swiftly and proficiently.

In the event you find an error inside the content material of a published opinion (for instance a misspelled name or possibly a grammatical error), please notify the Reporter of Decisions. TVW

161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming towards the main case, it is also a perfectly-recognized proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of get more info your charge, however, that is issue to your procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.

12. There is not any denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons owning their character previously mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are to be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is really a condition precedent for appointment to the Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to the Government service would be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to do absent with the candidature of the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 185 Order Date: fifteen-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

This page contains slip opinions. Slip opinions are classified as the opinions that are filed about the working day that the appellate court issues its decision and are sometimes not the court's final opinion.

Statutory laws are People created by legislative bodies, such as Congress at both the federal and state levels. When this sort of regulation strives to form our society, providing rules and guidelines, it would be difficult for just about any legislative body to anticipate all situations and legal issues.

In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials performing within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case legislation previously rendered on similar cases.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, it is also a nicely-proven proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is subject towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.